KOKU vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KOKU or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. KOKU is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOKU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $811M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2,185 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.45% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.81% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.82% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.8% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,482 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.6%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.5 years).
KOKU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.5 years both funds cover.
KOKU vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KOKU returned +15.81% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, KOKU is up 11.45% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, KOKU compounded at +21.26% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.82% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +18.25% annualized vs +17.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for KOKU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.8% for KOKU and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOKU charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOKU currently yields 1.32% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
75.9% of KOKU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 89.2% of VTI's money is in holdings KOKU also owns.
Most of VTI is already inside KOKU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
493 positions in common, counted across the 1,079 positions we hold weights for in KOKU and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 2,185 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 668 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KOKU (8.7% of the fund), and 12 for KOKU that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KOKU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.66% | 6.88% | 1.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.71% | 6.30% | 0.59% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.16% | 5.11% | 0.95% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.86% | 3.41% | 0.55% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.70% | 0.31% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.82% | 2.38% | 0.56% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.89% | 2.12% | 0.23% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.71% | 1.70% | 0.01% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.22% | 1.46% | 0.24% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.20% | 1.40% | 0.20% |
89.2% of VTI is already inside KOKU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOKU or VTI?
KOKU has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOKU or VTI?
Over the past year KOKU returned +15.81% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), KOKU annualized +17.51% vs +18.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOKU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for KOKU. Worst drawdown: KOKU -25.8% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both KOKU and VTI?
KOKU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOKU and VTI?
89.2% of VTI's money is in holdings KOKU also owns. 89.2% of VTI's is in holdings KOKU also owns. They hold 493 positions in common, counted across the 1,079 positions we hold weights for in KOKU and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOKU or VTI?
KOKU yields 1.32% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KOKU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KOKU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. KOKU is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.