KOOL vs LRGC
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, KOOL or LRGC?
KOOL has been ahead.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. KOOL is less concentrated, with 42.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOOL | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $60M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 42 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +15.54%Best | +10.99% |
| 1Y Return | +16.89%Best | +13.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.6% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $14,826Best | $14,474 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.8%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | North Shore Indices | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2024 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
KOOL vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
KOOL vs LRGC Performance
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year KOOL returned +16.89% while LRGC returned +13.29%. Year to date, KOOL is up 15.54% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 12.0% for KOOL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.6% for KOOL and -19.4% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOOL charges 0.93% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $39 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOOL currently yields 0.43% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
28.4% of KOOL's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 35.0% of LRGC's money is in holdings KOOL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in KOOL and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 42 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 56 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for KOOL (60.9% of the fund), and 31 for KOOL that do not appear in LRGC (64.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KOOL | Weight in LRGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.78% | 8.71% | 2.93% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.31% | 5.71% | 1.40% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.11% | 6.66% | 3.55% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.34% | 4.69% | 0.35% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.20% | 3.44% | 0.24% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.97% | 2.93% | 0.96% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 3.00% | 0.94% | 2.06% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.50% | 1.41% | 0.09% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.20% | 0.53% | 0.67% |
35.0% of LRGC is already inside KOOL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOOL or LRGC?
KOOL has an expense ratio of 0.93% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOOL or LRGC?
Over the past year KOOL returned +16.89% vs +13.29% for LRGC, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOOL or LRGC?
LRGC has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 12.0% for KOOL. Worst drawdown: KOOL -20.6% vs LRGC -19.4%.
Should I hold both KOOL and LRGC?
KOOL and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOOL and LRGC?
35.0% of LRGC's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 35.0% of LRGC's is in holdings KOOL also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in KOOL and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOOL or LRGC?
KOOL yields 0.43% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so LRGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than KOOL?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. KOOL is less concentrated, with 42.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.