KOOL vs MILN
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF vs Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
Which is better, KOOL or MILN?
KOOL has been ahead.
MILN has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOOL | MILN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $60M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 42 | 164 |
| YTD Return | +15.54%Best | -7.25% |
| 1Y Return | +16.89%Best | -10.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 16.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.6%Best | -23.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $14,826Best | $11,316 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.8% | 33.8%Best |
| Fund Family | North Shore Indices | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2024 | May 4, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
KOOL vs MILN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
KOOL vs MILN Performance
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices and Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year KOOL returned +16.89% while MILN returned -10.86%. Year to date, KOOL is up 15.54% versus a loss of 7.25% for MILN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MILN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 12.0% for KOOL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.6% for KOOL and -23.5% for MILN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOOL charges 0.93% per year while MILN charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $50 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOOL currently yields 0.43% against 0.33% for MILN.
Holdings Overlap
15.5% of KOOL's money is in holdings MILN also owns. 13.9% of MILN's money is in holdings KOOL also owns.
KOOL and MILN share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in KOOL and 80 in MILN, against full books of 42 and 164.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 74 positions for MILN that do not appear in our book for KOOL (81.9% of the fund), and 36 for KOOL that do not appear in MILN (77.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KOOL and MILN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOOL or MILN?
KOOL has an expense ratio of 0.93% while MILN charges 0.50%. MILN is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOOL or MILN?
Over the past year KOOL returned +16.89% vs -10.86% for MILN, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOOL or MILN?
MILN has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 12.0% for KOOL. Worst drawdown: KOOL -20.6% vs MILN -23.5%.
Should I hold both KOOL and MILN?
KOOL and MILN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOOL and MILN?
15.5% of KOOL's money is in holdings MILN also owns. 13.9% of MILN's is in holdings KOOL also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in KOOL and 80 in MILN.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOOL or MILN?
KOOL yields 0.43% while MILN yields 0.33%, so KOOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MILN better than KOOL?
MILN has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.