KOOL vs RJCA

KOOL vs RJCA

Which is better, KOOL or RJCA?

RJCA has been ahead.

RJCA has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. KOOL is less concentrated, with 42.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.

Lower Fees: RJCAHigher Returns (1Y): RJCALess Concentrated: KOOL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKOOLRJCA
Expense Ratio0.93%0.61%Best
AUM$60M$617M
Dividend Yield0.43%0.00%
Holdings4272
YTD Return+15.54%Best+4.02%
1Y Return+16.89%-
Top 10 Weight42.8%Best57.0%
Fund FamilyNorth Shore IndicesCarillon Family of Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionApr 1, 2024Mar 21, 2006

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

KOOL vs RJCA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare KOOL against instead:KOOL vs SPYKOOL vs QQQKOOL vs VOOKOOL vs VTIRJCA against:RJCA vs VXUS

KOOL vs RJCA Performance

North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, KOOL is up 15.54% versus a gain of 4.02% for RJCA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KOOL charges 0.93% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $61 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOOL currently yields 0.43% against 0.00% for RJCA.

Holdings Overlap

KOOL already in RJCA28.7%
RJCA already in KOOL47.6%

28.7% of KOOL's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 47.6% of RJCA's money is in holdings KOOL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in KOOL and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 42 and 72.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 61 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for KOOL (51.5% of the fund), and 31 for KOOL that do not appear in RJCA (64.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in KOOLWeight in RJCADifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.78%15.22%9.44%
AAPLApple, Inc4.31%7.19%2.88%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.11%7.85%4.74%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.65%4.73%1.08%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.97%5.18%3.21%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.20%3.16%0.04%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.34%1.94%2.40%
ANETArista Networks Inc.1.51%1.69%0.18%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co0.85%0.60%0.25%

47.6% of RJCA is already inside KOOL.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

KOOLRJCA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KOOL or RJCA?

KOOL has an expense ratio of 0.93% while RJCA charges 0.61%. RJCA is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between KOOL and RJCA?

47.6% of RJCA's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 47.6% of RJCA's is in holdings KOOL also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in KOOL and 71 in RJCA.

Which pays a higher dividend, KOOL or RJCA?

KOOL yields 0.43% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so KOOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RJCA better than KOOL?

RJCA has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. KOOL is less concentrated, with 42.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.