LRGG vs TCHP
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, LRGG or TCHP?
TCHP has been ahead.
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. TCHP led over 1Y and the full window. TCHP is less concentrated, with 59.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGG | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $295M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 44 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +3.29%Best | +2.74% |
| 1Y Return | +3.58% | +5.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 16.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9%Best | -22.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $11,970 | $14,009Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 71.4% | 59.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
LRGG vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
LRGG vs TCHP Performance
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year LRGG returned +3.58% while TCHP returned +5.10%. Year to date, LRGG is up 3.29% versus a gain of 2.74% for TCHP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 12.4% for LRGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for LRGG and -22.9% for TCHP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGG charges 0.44% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $57 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGG currently yields 0.15% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
73.8% of LRGG's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 47.9% of TCHP's money is in holdings LRGG also owns.
Most of LRGG is already inside TCHP. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
12 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LRGG and 62 in TCHP, against full books of 44 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 48 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for LRGG (50.5% of the fund), and 8 for LRGG that do not appear in TCHP (23.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGG | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 17.15% | 17.43% | 0.28% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 10.98% | 5.94% | 5.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.02% | 5.92% | 3.10% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.88% | 4.94% | 1.94% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.60% | 2.69% | 1.91% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 6.23% | 0.91% | 5.32% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.49% | 3.60% | 0.11% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 4.04% | 1.75% | 2.29% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 4.50% | 0.86% | 3.64% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.42% | 1.99% | 0.43% |
73.8% of LRGG is already inside TCHP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGG or TCHP?
LRGG has an expense ratio of 0.44% while TCHP charges 0.57%. LRGG is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LRGG or TCHP?
Over the past year LRGG returned +3.58% vs +5.10% for TCHP, so TCHP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LRGG annualized +7.78% vs +15.08% for TCHP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LRGG or TCHP?
TCHP has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 12.4% for LRGG. Worst drawdown: LRGG -18.9% vs TCHP -22.9%.
Should I hold both LRGG and TCHP?
LRGG and TCHP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGG and TCHP?
73.8% of LRGG's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 47.9% of TCHP's is in holdings LRGG also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LRGG and 62 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGG or TCHP?
LRGG yields 0.15% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so LRGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than LRGG?
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. TCHP led over 1Y and the full window. TCHP is less concentrated, with 59.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.