LSVD vs OAKM
LSV Disciplined Value ETF vs Oakmark US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, LSVD or OAKM?
LSVD has been ahead.
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSVD | OAKM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $678M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.65% |
| Holdings | 136 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +20.92%Best | +6.05% |
| 1Y Return | +30.07%Best | +14.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -15.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,810Best | $13,026 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0%Tie | 35.0%Tie |
| Fund Family | LSV Asset Management | Oakmark Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Dec 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
LSVD vs OAKM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
LSVD vs OAKM Performance
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management and Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds. Over the past year LSVD returned +30.07% while OAKM returned +14.80%. Year to date, LSVD is up 20.92% versus a gain of 6.05% for OAKM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 12.2% for OAKM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for LSVD and -15.2% for OAKM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSVD charges 0.40% per year while OAKM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $59 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSVD currently yields 0.27% against 0.65% for OAKM.
Holdings Overlap
20.4% of LSVD's money is in holdings OAKM also owns. 38.5% of OAKM's money is in holdings LSVD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 39 in OAKM, against full books of 136 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 21 positions for OAKM that do not appear in our book for LSVD (54.4% of the fund), and 118 for LSVD that do not appear in OAKM (79.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSVD | Weight in OAKM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 1.50% | 4.23% | 2.73% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.67% | 1.61% | 2.06% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.07% | 2.21% | 0.86% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.80% | 2.43% | 0.37% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.12% | 3.49% | 2.37% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.74% | 3.67% | 2.93% |
| STTState Street Corp. | 0.90% | 3.30% | 2.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.61% | 0.09% | 3.52% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 0.42% | 3.20% | 2.78% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.45% | 3.07% | 2.62% |
38.5% of OAKM is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSVD or OAKM?
LSVD has an expense ratio of 0.40% while OAKM charges 0.59%. LSVD is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSVD or OAKM?
Over the past year LSVD returned +30.07% vs +14.80% for OAKM, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LSVD annualized +24.38% vs +15.82% for OAKM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSVD or OAKM?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 12.2% for OAKM. Worst drawdown: LSVD -19.3% vs OAKM -15.2%.
Should I hold both LSVD and OAKM?
LSVD and OAKM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSVD and OAKM?
38.5% of OAKM's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 38.5% of OAKM's is in holdings LSVD also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 39 in OAKM.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSVD or OAKM?
LSVD yields 0.27% while OAKM yields 0.65%, so OAKM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OAKM better than LSVD?
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.