LSVD vs SIXH
LSV Disciplined Value ETF vs ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF
Which is better, LSVD or SIXH?
LSVD has been ahead.
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. SIXH is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSVD | SIXH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40%Best | 0.73% |
| AUM | $678M | $605M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.78% |
| Holdings | 136 | 106 |
| YTD Return | +20.92%Best | +14.72% |
| 1Y Return | +30.07%Best | +17.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 7.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -9.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,810Best | $12,612 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 33.6%Best |
| Fund Family | LSV Asset Management | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | May 11, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
LSVD vs SIXH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
LSVD vs SIXH Performance
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management and ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF (SIXH) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year LSVD returned +30.07% while SIXH returned +17.59%. Year to date, LSVD is up 20.92% versus a gain of 14.72% for SIXH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 7.6% for SIXH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for LSVD and -9.1% for SIXH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSVD charges 0.40% per year while SIXH charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $73 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSVD currently yields 0.27% against 1.78% for SIXH.
Holdings Overlap
42.4% of LSVD's money is in holdings SIXH also owns. 56.5% of SIXH's money is in holdings LSVD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 52 in SIXH, against full books of 136 and 106.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for SIXH that do not appear in our book for LSVD (44.1% of the fund), and 106 for LSVD that do not appear in SIXH (57.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSVD | Weight in SIXH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.81% | 1.37% | 5.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.62% | 1.33% | 4.29% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.62% | 4.93% | 4.31% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.21% | 2.97% | 0.76% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.67% | 1.26% | 2.41% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.61% | 1.30% | 2.31% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.80% | 1.62% | 1.18% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.71% | 3.56% | 2.85% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.65% | 3.55% | 2.90% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.26% | 2.86% | 1.60% |
56.5% of SIXH is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSVD or SIXH?
LSVD has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SIXH charges 0.73%. LSVD is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSVD or SIXH?
Over the past year LSVD returned +30.07% vs +17.59% for SIXH, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LSVD annualized +24.38% vs +13.76% for SIXH. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSVD or SIXH?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 7.6% for SIXH. Worst drawdown: LSVD -19.3% vs SIXH -9.1%.
Should I hold both LSVD and SIXH?
LSVD and SIXH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSVD and SIXH?
56.5% of SIXH's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 56.5% of SIXH's is in holdings LSVD also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 52 in SIXH.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSVD or SIXH?
LSVD yields 0.27% while SIXH yields 1.78%, so SIXH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIXH better than LSVD?
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. SIXH is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.