LSVD vs WBIG
LSV Disciplined Value ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Which is better, LSVD or WBIG?
LSVD has been ahead.
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSVD | WBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40%Best | 1.59% |
| AUM | $678M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 136 | 159 |
| YTD Return | +20.92%Best | +12.49% |
| 1Y Return | +30.07%Best | +11.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.85% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +1.53% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -17.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,810Best | $11,253 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 23.9%Best |
| Fund Family | LSV Asset Management | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
LSVD vs WBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
LSVD vs WBIG Performance
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year LSVD returned +30.07% while WBIG returned +11.17%. Year to date, LSVD is up 20.92% versus a gain of 12.49% for WBIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 11.3% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for LSVD and -17.4% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSVD charges 0.40% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $159 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSVD currently yields 0.27% against 1.17% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
7.1% of LSVD's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 18.1% of WBIG's money is in holdings LSVD also owns.
WBIG and LSVD share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 71 in WBIG, against full books of 136 and 159.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 54 positions for WBIG that do not appear in our book for LSVD (74.6% of the fund), and 120 for LSVD that do not appear in WBIG (92.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSVD | Weight in WBIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPQHP Inc | 0.45% | 2.35% | 1.90% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 0.44% | 2.09% | 1.65% |
| PEGAPegasystems, Inc. | 0.33% | 2.15% | 1.82% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.95% | 1.49% | 0.54% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.05% | 1.28% | 0.23% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.56% | 1.17% | 0.61% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 0.50% | 1.22% | 0.72% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.51% | 1.18% | 0.67% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.27% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.40% | 1.19% | 0.79% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LSVD and WBIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSVD or WBIG?
LSVD has an expense ratio of 0.40% while WBIG charges 1.59%. LSVD is the cheaper option, by $119 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSVD or WBIG?
Over the past year LSVD returned +30.07% vs +11.17% for WBIG, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LSVD annualized +24.38% vs +6.78% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSVD or WBIG?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 11.3% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: LSVD -19.3% vs WBIG -17.4%.
Should I hold both LSVD and WBIG?
LSVD and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSVD and WBIG?
18.1% of WBIG's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 18.1% of WBIG's is in holdings LSVD also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 71 in WBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSVD or WBIG?
LSVD yields 0.27% while WBIG yields 1.17%, so WBIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIG better than LSVD?
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.