LVDS vs PRF
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF vs Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
Which is better, LVDS or PRF?
Each has led over a different period.
LVDS has a lower expense ratio. LVDS led over 1Y, PRF over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. PRF is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LVDS | PRF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30%Best | 0.34% |
| AUM | $114M | $10.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.56% | 1.36% |
| Holdings | 133 | 2,000 |
| YTD Return | +20.52%Best | +18.98% |
| 1Y Return | +25.95%Best | +25.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6% | 10.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -6.6%Tie | -6.6%Tie |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,088 | $13,392Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.3% | 23.7%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | Dec 19, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
LVDS vs PRF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
LVDS vs PRF Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LVDS returned +25.95% while PRF returned +25.61%. Year to date, LVDS is up 20.52% versus a gain of 18.98% for PRF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.6% compared with 10.1% for PRF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.6% for LVDS and -6.6% for PRF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LVDS charges 0.30% per year while PRF charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $34 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LVDS currently yields 7.56% against 1.36% for PRF.
Holdings Overlap
93.8% of LVDS's money is in holdings PRF also owns. 44.0% of PRF's money is in holdings LVDS also owns.
Most of LVDS is already inside PRF. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
121 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in LVDS and 907 in PRF, against full books of 133 and 2,000.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 754 positions for PRF that do not appear in our book for LVDS (52.0% of the fund), and 8 for LVDS that do not appear in PRF (4.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LVDS | Weight in PRF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.39% | 4.67% | 0.72% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.92% | 3.18% | 2.74% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.39% | 2.32% | 4.07% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.46% | 1.91% | 0.55% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.29% | 2.10% | 0.81% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 1.82% | 0.78% | 1.04% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.93% | 0.62% | 1.31% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.38% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.52% | 0.79% | 0.73% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.01% |
93.8% of LVDS is already inside PRF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LVDS or PRF?
LVDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while PRF charges 0.34%. LVDS is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LVDS or PRF?
Over the past year LVDS returned +25.95% vs +25.61% for PRF, so LVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LVDS annualized +23.00% vs +25.19% for PRF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LVDS or PRF?
LVDS has been the more volatile fund at 10.6% annualized versus 10.1% for PRF. Worst drawdown: LVDS -6.6% vs PRF -6.6%.
Should I hold both LVDS and PRF?
LVDS and PRF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LVDS and PRF?
93.8% of LVDS's money is in holdings PRF also owns. 44.0% of PRF's is in holdings LVDS also owns. They hold 121 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in LVDS and 907 in PRF.
Which pays a higher dividend, LVDS or PRF?
LVDS yields 7.56% while PRF yields 1.36%, so LVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PRF better than LVDS?
LVDS has a lower expense ratio. LVDS led over 1Y, PRF over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. PRF is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.