MAVF vs VOO
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MAVF or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 29 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +13.01% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.46%Best | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4%Best | -16.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,491Best | $13,078 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.6% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs VOO Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, MAVF is up 13.01% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -16.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
95.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 27.0% of VOO's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
Most of MAVF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
25 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 504 in VOO, against full books of 29 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 504 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 474 positions MAVF does not, 72.7% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.09%, GOOGL 3.01%, AVGO 2.65%, MU 1.64%, TSLA 1.57%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAVF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.61% | 5.70% | 2.91% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.06% | 7.04% | 0.02% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.38% | 3.85% | 2.53% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 7.81% | 2.40% | 5.41% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.73% | 1.90% | 3.83% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.19% | 1.44% | 1.75% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 4.35% | 0.02% | 4.33% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.98% | 0.27% | 3.71% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.27% | 0.55% | 2.72% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 3.34% | 0.40% | 2.94% |
95.3% of MAVF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or VOO?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or VOO?
Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% vs +17.55% for VOO, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +20.58% vs +18.26% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or VOO?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs VOO -16.5%.
Should I hold both MAVF and VOO?
MAVF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and VOO?
95.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 27.0% of VOO's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or VOO?
MAVF yields 0.37% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MAVF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.