MAVF vs VTI
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MAVF or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +13.01% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.46%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4%Best | -16.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,491Best | $12,995 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.6% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs VTI Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, MAVF is up 13.01% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -16.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.5% of MAVF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 23.9% of VTI's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
Most of MAVF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 29 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 3,441 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,132 positions MAVF does not, 73.7% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.88%, GOOGL 2.70%, AVGO 2.38%, MU 1.46%, TSLA 1.40%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAVF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.61% | 5.11% | 3.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.06% | 6.30% | 0.76% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 7.81% | 2.12% | 5.69% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.38% | 3.41% | 2.97% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.73% | 1.70% | 4.03% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.19% | 1.29% | 1.90% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 4.35% | 0.01% | 4.34% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.98% | 0.24% | 3.74% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 3.81% | 0.08% | 3.73% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.27% | 0.49% | 2.78% |
93.5% of MAVF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or VTI?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or VTI?
Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% vs +16.63% for VTI, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +20.58% vs +17.79% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or VTI?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs VTI -16.9%.
Should I hold both MAVF and VTI?
MAVF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and VTI?
93.5% of MAVF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 23.9% of VTI's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or VTI?
MAVF yields 0.37% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MAVF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.