MDAA vs QQQ
Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MDAA or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MDAA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $454M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 82 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +13.56% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.15% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3%Best | 21.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,499 | $12,075Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.2% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Myriad Asset Management LP | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 3, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
MDAA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
MDAA vs QQQ Performance
Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) is an ETF from Myriad Asset Management LP and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MDAA returned +17.15% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, MDAA is up 13.56% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 20.3% for MDAA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for MDAA and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MDAA charges 0.97% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $18 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MDAA currently yields 0.39% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
40.4% of MDAA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 55.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings MDAA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in MDAA and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 82 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 75 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MDAA (41.4% of the fund), and 41 for MDAA that do not appear in QQQ (51.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MDAA | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.28% | 8.33% | 2.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.22% | 5.76% | 0.46% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.69% | 7.35% | 3.66% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.59% | 4.07% | 0.52% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.63% | 3.05% | 1.58% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.56% | 5.02% | 2.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.48% | 3.26% | 0.78% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.05% | 4.17% | 3.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.66% | 2.53% | 0.87% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.60% | 2.64% | 2.04% |
55.6% of QQQ is already inside MDAA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MDAA or QQQ?
MDAA has an expense ratio of 0.97% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MDAA or QQQ?
Over the past year MDAA returned +17.15% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MDAA annualized +14.99% vs +20.75% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MDAA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 20.3% for MDAA. Worst drawdown: MDAA -14.6% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both MDAA and QQQ?
MDAA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MDAA and QQQ?
55.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings MDAA also owns. 55.6% of QQQ's is in holdings MDAA also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in MDAA and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MDAA or QQQ?
MDAA yields 0.39% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MDAA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.