MFVL vs QQQ
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MFVL or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MFVL is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFVL | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 104 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +8.47% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MFVL vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MFVL vs QQQ Performance
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is an ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MFVL is up 8.47% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFVL charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFVL currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
19.7% of MFVL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings MFVL also owns.
MFVL and QQQ share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in MFVL and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 104 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 101 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 87 positions MFVL does not, 94.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.33%, AAPL 7.35%, MSFT 5.76%, MU 5.02%, AMD 4.17%
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MFVL and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFVL or QQQ?
MFVL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MFVL and QQQ?
19.7% of MFVL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.3% of QQQ's is in holdings MFVL also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in MFVL and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFVL or QQQ?
MFVL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MFVL?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MFVL is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.