MFVL vs VYM
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MFVL or VYM?
VYM costs less.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFVL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 104 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +10.82% | +12.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.50% |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MFVL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MFVL vs VYM Performance
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is an ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, MFVL is up 10.82% versus a gain of 12.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFVL charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFVL currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
51.5% of MFVL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.2% of VYM's money is in holdings MFVL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in MFVL and 602 in VYM, against full books of 104 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 101 and 602 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 545 positions MFVL does not, 89.2% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 6.94%, JPM 3.83%, JNJ 2.58%, ABBV 1.83%, CSCO 1.76%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFVL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 5.32% | 2.70% | 2.62% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 5.33% | 1.54% | 3.79% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 4.87% | 0.55% | 4.32% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 4.37% | 0.77% | 3.60% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 4.30% | 0.54% | 3.76% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 3.99% | 0.35% | 3.64% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp | 3.78% | 0.49% | 3.29% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 3.20% | 0.51% | 2.69% |
| FDXFedex Corp | 2.97% | 0.29% | 2.68% |
| NKENike Inc | 1.93% | 0.19% | 1.74% |
51.5% of MFVL is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFVL or VYM?
MFVL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MFVL and VYM?
51.5% of MFVL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.2% of VYM's is in holdings MFVL also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in MFVL and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFVL or VYM?
MFVL yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MFVL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.