MGNR vs VTI
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MGNR or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MGNR led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGNR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $198M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.83% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 45 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.86% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.22%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $20,489Best | $15,962 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.8% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | American Beacon Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 6, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
MGNR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
MGNR vs VTI Performance
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an ETF from American Beacon Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGNR returned +19.22% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, MGNR is up 8.86% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for MGNR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGNR charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGNR currently yields 0.83% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
44.9% of MGNR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.7% of VTI's money is in holdings MGNR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in MGNR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 45 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,136 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MGNR (96.9% of the fund), and 0 for MGNR that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MGNR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VGVenture Global Inc | 4.65% | 0.01% | 4.64% |
| RRCRange Resources Corp | 3.92% | 0.01% | 3.91% |
| ARAntero Resources Corp | 3.57% | 0.02% | 3.55% |
| DARDarling Ingredients, Inc. | 3.52% | 0.01% | 3.51% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 3.33% | 0.02% | 3.31% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 3.18% | 0.15% | 3.03% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 2.41% | 0.05% | 2.36% |
| AAAlcoa Corp | 2.34% | 0.02% | 2.32% |
| PRPermian Resource | 2.22% | 0.03% | 2.19% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common | 2.15% | 0.05% | 2.10% |
44.9% of MGNR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGNR or VTI?
MGNR has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MGNR or VTI?
Over the past year MGNR returned +19.22% vs +16.63% for VTI, so MGNR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MGNR or VTI?
MGNR has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MGNR -22.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MGNR and VTI?
MGNR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MGNR and VTI?
44.9% of MGNR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.7% of VTI's is in holdings MGNR also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in MGNR and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGNR or VTI?
MGNR yields 0.83% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MGNR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MGNR led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.