MHIG vs NDOW
Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF vs Anydrus Advantage ETF
Which is better, MHIG or NDOW?
MHIG costs less.
MHIG has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MHIG | NDOW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 2.11% |
| AUM | $998,910.43 | $69M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| Holdings | 75 | 169 |
| YTD Return | -0.43% | +3.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +7.31% |
| Fund Family | Milliman | Anydrus Capital |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2026 | May 14, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MHIG vs NDOW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MHIG vs NDOW Performance
Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF (MHIG) is an ETF from Milliman and Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is an ETF from Anydrus Capital. Year to date, MHIG is down 0.43% versus a gain of 3.27% for NDOW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MHIG charges 0.55% per year while NDOW charges 2.11%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $211 annually, a gap of $156 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MHIG currently yields 0.00% against 1.20% for NDOW.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.2% of NDOW's money is in holdings MHIG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MHIG, our book for it covers 82.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
NDOW and MHIG share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in MHIG and 80 in NDOW, against full books of 75 and 169.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MHIG | Weight in NDOW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.25% | 1.18% | 1.07% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.94% | 0.75% | 1.19% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.09% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 0.36% | 0.91% | 0.55% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.10% | 0.88% | 0.78% |
| BSXBoston Scientific Corp. | 0.34% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 0.14% | 0.73% | 0.59% |
| NBIXNeurocrine Biosciences Inc | 0.07% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MHIG and NDOW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MHIG or NDOW?
MHIG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while NDOW charges 2.11%. MHIG is the cheaper option, by $156 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MHIG and NDOW?
At least 6.2% of NDOW's money is in holdings MHIG also owns. Our book for MHIG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in MHIG and 80 in NDOW.
Which pays a higher dividend, MHIG or NDOW?
MHIG yields 0.00% while NDOW yields 1.20%, so NDOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NDOW better than MHIG?
MHIG has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.