MOTO vs RGLO
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Which is better, MOTO or RGLO?
MOTO has been ahead.
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. MOTO led over 1Y and the full window. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTO | RGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $368M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 76 | 384 |
| YTD Return | +10.57% | +11.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.81%Best | +18.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.70% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 10.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.1% | -9.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,793Best | $13,219 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.1% | 26.2%Best |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2019 | May 29, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
MOTO vs RGLO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
MOTO vs RGLO Performance
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is an ETF from SmartETFs and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year MOTO returned +18.81% while RGLO returned +18.24%. Year to date, MOTO is up 10.57% versus a gain of 11.84% for RGLO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOTO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 10.0% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.1% for MOTO and -9.6% for RGLO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTO charges 0.68% per year while RGLO charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $49 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTO currently yields 0.92% against 0.57% for RGLO.
Holdings Overlap
38.2% of MOTO's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 11.6% of RGLO's money is in holdings MOTO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in MOTO and 346 in RGLO, against full books of 76 and 384.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 105 positions for RGLO that do not appear in our book for MOTO (42.6% of the fund), and 14 for MOTO that do not appear in RGLO (33.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOTO | Weight in RGLO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.75% | 4.99% | 0.24% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 6.13% | 1.44% | 4.69% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.00% | 2.83% | 1.17% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 4.84% | 0.37% | 4.47% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4.58% | 0.32% | 4.26% |
| IFX:FFInfineon Technologies AG Infineon Technologies Agnamens Aktien O N | 4.57% | 0.23% | 4.34% |
| SIE:SGSiemens N Ag | 3.49% | 0.22% | 3.27% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.93% | 0.69% | 2.24% |
| CONG:FFContinental Ag | 1.45% | 0.11% | 1.34% |
| VOW3.D:BEVolkswagen AG Preferred Stock | 1.10% | 0.16% | 0.94% |
38.2% of MOTO is already inside RGLO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTO or RGLO?
MOTO has an expense ratio of 0.68% while RGLO charges 0.49%. RGLO is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOTO or RGLO?
Over the past year MOTO returned +18.81% vs +18.24% for RGLO, so MOTO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MOTO annualized +25.82% vs +22.06% for RGLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOTO or RGLO?
MOTO has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 10.0% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: MOTO -16.1% vs RGLO -9.6%.
Should I hold both MOTO and RGLO?
MOTO and RGLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTO and RGLO?
38.2% of MOTO's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 11.6% of RGLO's is in holdings MOTO also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in MOTO and 346 in RGLO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTO or RGLO?
MOTO yields 0.92% while RGLO yields 0.57%, so MOTO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGLO better than MOTO?
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. MOTO led over 1Y and the full window. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.