NBET vs TPLC
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF vs Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
Which is better, NBET or TPLC?
NBET has been ahead.
TPLC has a lower expense ratio. NBET led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TPLC is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBET | TPLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $311M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.57% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 34 | 542 |
| YTD Return | +24.35%Best | +9.85% |
| 1Y Return | +28.92%Best | +10.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.01%Best | +13.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7% | -18.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $17,443Best | $14,394 |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.6% | 7.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | Timothy Plan |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2022 | May 5, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Oct 15, 2026 (4.5 years).
NBET vs TPLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
NBET vs TPLC Performance
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust and Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF (TPLC) is an ETF from Timothy Plan. Over the past year NBET returned +28.92% while TPLC returned +10.37%. Year to date, NBET is up 24.35% versus a gain of 9.85% for TPLC.
Over three years, NBET compounded at +25.01% per year against +13.97% for TPLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.8% for TPLC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for NBET and -18.2% for TPLC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBET charges 0.65% per year while TPLC charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $52 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBET currently yields 2.57% against 0.86% for TPLC.
Holdings Overlap
39.8% of NBET's money is in holdings TPLC also owns. 4.0% of TPLC's money is in holdings NBET also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in NBET and 268 in TPLC, against full books of 34 and 542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 251 positions for TPLC that do not appear in our book for NBET (93.2% of the fund), and 19 for NBET that do not appear in TPLC (57.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NBET | Weight in TPLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 9.18% | 0.47% | 8.71% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 6.25% | 0.43% | 5.82% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 6.05% | 0.48% | 5.57% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 5.12% | 0.49% | 4.63% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 4.76% | 0.41% | 4.35% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 2.99% | 0.34% | 2.65% |
| WSOWatsco Inc | 1.89% | 0.26% | 1.63% |
| CNPCenterpoint Energy Inc. | 1.39% | 0.61% | 0.78% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.10% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corp | 0.80% | 0.28% | 0.52% |
39.8% of NBET is already inside TPLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBET or TPLC?
NBET has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TPLC charges 0.52%. TPLC is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBET or TPLC?
Over the past year NBET returned +28.92% vs +10.37% for TPLC, so NBET leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBET or TPLC?
NBET has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.8% for TPLC. Worst drawdown: NBET -18.7% vs TPLC -18.2%.
Should I hold both NBET and TPLC?
NBET and TPLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NBET and TPLC?
39.8% of NBET's money is in holdings TPLC also owns. 4.0% of TPLC's is in holdings NBET also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in NBET and 268 in TPLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBET or TPLC?
NBET yields 2.57% while TPLC yields 0.86%, so NBET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TPLC better than NBET?
TPLC has a lower expense ratio. NBET led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TPLC is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.