NBFR vs PBQQ
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF
Which is better, NBFR or PBQQ?
PBQQ costs less.
PBQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBFR | PBQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $98M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| Holdings | 106 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +5.93% | +12.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.38% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | Dec 27, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NBFR vs PBQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NBFR vs PBQQ Performance
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, NBFR is up 5.93% versus a gain of 12.12% for PBQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBFR charges 0.79% per year while PBQQ charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $50 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBFR currently yields 0.02% against 0.01% for PBQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 44 holdings in NBFR and 4 in PBQQ, totalling 97.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in NBFR and 4 in PBQQ, against full books of 106 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBFR and PBQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBFR or PBQQ?
NBFR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while PBQQ charges 0.50%. PBQQ is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBFR or PBQQ?
NBFR yields 0.02% while PBQQ yields 0.01%, so NBFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBQQ better than NBFR?
PBQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.