NSCS vs RESM

NSCS vs RESM

Which is better, NSCS or RESM?

RESM costs less.

RESM has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: RESM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNSCSRESM
Expense Ratio0.86%0.32%Best
AUM$7M$6M
Dividend Yield0.31%0.08%
Holdings822,051
Volatility (annualized)20.8%-
Max Drawdown-30.6%-
Fund FamilyNuveenColumbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendSmall Cap Blend
InceptionAug 4, 2021Dec 11, 2025

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 478 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. NSCS has data through Jun 23, 2025 and RESM through Oct 14, 2026.

Compare NSCS against instead:NSCS vs SPYNSCS vs QQQNSCS vs VOONSCS vs VTIRESM against:RESM vs VXUS

Fees and Cost Over Time

NSCS charges 0.86% per year while RESM charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $32 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NSCS currently yields 0.31% against 0.08% for RESM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NSCS and RESM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NSCSRESM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NSCS or RESM?

NSCS has an expense ratio of 0.86% while RESM charges 0.32%. RESM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, NSCS or RESM?

NSCS yields 0.31% while RESM yields 0.08%, so NSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RESM better than NSCS?

RESM has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.