NSI vs RWEM
National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, NSI or RWEM?
RWEM has been ahead.
RWEM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NSI | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $43M | $71M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 204 | 450 |
| YTD Return | +8.60% | +15.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.93% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.4% | 35.9%Best |
| Fund Family | National Security Index | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NSI vs RWEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NSI vs RWEM Performance
National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is an ETF from National Security Index and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, NSI is up 8.60% versus a gain of 15.92% for RWEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NSI charges 0.75% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $52 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NSI currently yields 1.21% against 1.77% for RWEM.
Holdings Overlap
16.4% of NSI's money is in holdings RWEM also owns. 10.5% of RWEM's money is in holdings NSI also owns.
NSI and RWEM share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in NSI and 223 in RWEM, against full books of 204 and 450.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for RWEM that do not appear in our book for NSI (0.0% of the fund), and 32 for NSI that do not appear in RWEM (25.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NSI | Weight in RWEM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 15.50% | 9.30% | 6.20% |
| HTHT:SHH World Group Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 1 Ordinary) | 0.24% | 0.58% | 0.34% |
| VIPSVipshop Holdings Ltd | 0.30% | 0.29% | 0.01% |
| BAPCredicorp Ltd - Common | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.07% |
| SNY:PEBuenaventura Adr Representing | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NSI and RWEM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NSI or RWEM?
NSI has an expense ratio of 0.75% while RWEM charges 0.52%. RWEM is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NSI and RWEM?
16.4% of NSI's money is in holdings RWEM also owns. 10.5% of RWEM's is in holdings NSI also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in NSI and 223 in RWEM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NSI or RWEM?
NSI yields 1.21% while RWEM yields 1.77%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWEM better than NSI?
RWEM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.