NTSX vs PWRD
WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Which is better, NTSX or PWRD?
Each has led over a different period.
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. NTSX led over 1Y, PWRD over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSX | PWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 506 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +8.74%Best | +3.29% |
| 1Y Return | +10.97%Best | +2.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.03% | +25.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.36% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4%Best | 23.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.0% | -25.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $15,241 | $21,348Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2018 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.7 years).
NTSX vs PWRD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
NTSX vs PWRD Performance
WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year NTSX returned +10.97% while PWRD returned +2.06%. Year to date, NTSX is up 8.74% versus a gain of 3.29% for PWRD.
Over three years, NTSX compounded at +20.03% per year against +25.66% for PWRD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWRD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 16.4% for NTSX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.0% for NTSX and -25.9% for PWRD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSX charges 0.20% per year while PWRD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $75 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSX currently yields 1.08% against 0.06% for PWRD.
Holdings Overlap
At least 67.3% of PWRD's money is in holdings NTSX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSX, our book for it covers 90.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in NTSX and 28 in PWRD, against full books of 506 and 56.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NTSX | Weight in PWRD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.47% | 8.02% | 7.55% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.32% | 5.72% | 5.40% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.06% | 3.79% | 1.73% |
| KLACKla-tencor | 0.30% | 5.32% | 5.02% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.46% | 4.88% | 4.42% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.22% | 4.29% | 4.07% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 0.98% | 3.35% | 2.37% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.12% | 3.89% | 3.77% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.31% | 3.56% | 3.25% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 0.08% | 3.75% | 3.67% |
67.3% of PWRD is already inside NTSX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSX or PWRD?
NTSX has an expense ratio of 0.20% while PWRD charges 0.75%. NTSX is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NTSX or PWRD?
Over the past year NTSX returned +10.97% vs +2.06% for PWRD, so NTSX leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NTSX or PWRD?
PWRD has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 16.4% for NTSX. Worst drawdown: NTSX -27.0% vs PWRD -25.9%.
Should I hold both NTSX and PWRD?
NTSX and PWRD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSX and PWRD?
At least 67.3% of PWRD's money is in holdings NTSX also owns. Our book for NTSX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in NTSX and 28 in PWRD.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSX or PWRD?
NTSX yields 1.08% while PWRD yields 0.06%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PWRD better than NTSX?
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. NTSX led over 1Y, PWRD over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.