NUDG vs PJUS
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF vs PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF
Which is better, NUDG or PJUS?
PJUS costs less.
PJUS has a lower expense ratio. PJUS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDG | PJUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $6.2B | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 198 |
| YTD Return | +3.09% | +5.58%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.3% | 41.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2026 | May 20, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NUDG vs PJUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NUDG vs PJUS Performance
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF (PJUS) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, NUDG is up 3.09% versus a gain of 5.58% for PJUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDG charges 0.61% per year while PJUS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $19 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 0.00% for PJUS.
Holdings Overlap
46.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings PJUS also owns. 26.6% of PJUS's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 97 in PJUS, against full books of 43 and 198.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 79 positions for PJUS that do not appear in our book for NUDG (72.5% of the fund), and 24 for NUDG that do not appear in PJUS (47.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUDG | Weight in PJUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.37% | 6.74% | 0.37% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.67% | 5.36% | 2.31% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.11% | 2.31% | 2.80% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.72% | 1.72% | 2.00% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.54% | 0.99% | 1.55% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.77% | 1.67% | 0.10% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 2.22% | 1.06% | 1.16% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.11% | 0.68% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.95% | 0.94% | 1.01% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 2.01% | 0.85% | 1.16% |
46.8% of NUDG is already inside PJUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDG or PJUS?
NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while PJUS charges 0.19%. PJUS is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and PJUS?
46.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings PJUS also owns. 26.6% of PJUS's is in holdings NUDG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 97 in PJUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or PJUS?
NUDG yields 0.50% while PJUS yields 0.00%, so NUDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJUS better than NUDG?
PJUS has a lower expense ratio. PJUS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.