NUDG vs QIDX

NUDG vs QIDX

Which is better, NUDG or QIDX?

NUDG has been ahead.

QIDX has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. QIDX is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.

Lower Fees: QIDXHigher Returns (1Y): NUDGLess Concentrated: QIDX

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNUDGQIDX
Expense Ratio0.61%0.50%Best
AUM$6.2B$39M
Dividend Yield0.50%0.93%
Holdings43264
YTD Return+2.67%+7.85%Best
1Y Return-+7.18%
Top 10 Weight42.3%26.2%Best
Fund FamilyNuveenIndexperts
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 2, 2026Dec 31, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NUDG vs QIDX growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare NUDG against instead:NUDG vs SPYNUDG vs QQQNUDG vs VOONUDG vs VTIQIDX against:QIDX vs VXUS

NUDG vs QIDX Performance

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) is an ETF from Indexperts. Year to date, NUDG is up 2.67% versus a gain of 7.85% for QIDX.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NUDG charges 0.61% per year while QIDX charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $50 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 0.93% for QIDX.

Holdings Overlap

NUDG already in QIDX37.1%
QIDX already in NUDG13.4%

37.1% of NUDG's money is in holdings QIDX also owns. 13.4% of QIDX's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 131 in QIDX, against full books of 43 and 264.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 118 positions for QIDX that do not appear in our book for NUDG (85.8% of the fund), and 29 for NUDG that do not appear in QIDX (57.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NUDGWeight in QIDXDifference
AAPLApple, Inc6.37%2.42%3.95%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.67%0.69%6.98%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A3.83%1.26%2.57%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.72%0.96%2.76%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd2.01%2.21%0.20%
WMTWalmart, Inc.1.79%1.56%0.23%
ABTAbbot Laboratories2.07%1.08%0.99%
MAMastercard Inc2.54%0.56%1.98%
TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#5855581.89%0.99%0.90%
AXPAmerican Express Co.2.24%0.61%1.63%

37.1% of NUDG is already inside QIDX.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NUDGQIDX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NUDG or QIDX?

NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while QIDX charges 0.50%. QIDX is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and QIDX?

37.1% of NUDG's money is in holdings QIDX also owns. 13.4% of QIDX's is in holdings NUDG also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 131 in QIDX.

Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or QIDX?

NUDG yields 0.50% while QIDX yields 0.93%, so QIDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QIDX better than NUDG?

QIDX has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. QIDX is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.