NUDG vs QLTY
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, NUDG or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDG | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $6.2B | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 43 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +2.67% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.84% |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.3%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2026 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NUDG vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NUDG vs QLTY Performance
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Year to date, NUDG is up 2.67% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDG charges 0.61% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $50 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
31.7% of NUDG's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 25.7% of QLTY's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 43 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 36 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for NUDG (74.0% of the fund), and 32 for NUDG that do not appear in QLTY (62.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUDG | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.67% | 8.00% | 0.33% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.37% | 4.20% | 2.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.11% | 3.70% | 1.41% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.54% | 2.40% | 0.14% |
| ABTAbbot Laboratories | 2.07% | 2.20% | 0.13% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.17% | 1.50% | 0.67% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.95% | 1.50% | 0.45% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.04% | 1.00% | 1.04% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 1.81% | 1.20% | 0.61% |
31.7% of NUDG is already inside QLTY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDG or QLTY?
NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and QLTY?
31.7% of NUDG's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 25.7% of QLTY's is in holdings NUDG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or QLTY?
NUDG yields 0.50% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than NUDG?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.