NUDG vs TIME

NUDG vs TIME

Which is better, NUDG or TIME?

TIME has been ahead.

NUDG has a lower expense ratio. TIME led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%.

Lower Fees: NUDGHigher Returns (1Y): TIMELess Concentrated: NUDG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNUDGTIME
Expense Ratio0.61%Best0.96%
AUM$6.2B$16M
Dividend Yield0.50%0.67%
Holdings4356
YTD Return+2.67%+11.28%Best
1Y Return-+13.37%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.43%
Top 10 Weight42.3%Best46.2%
Fund FamilyNuveenClockwise Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 2, 2026Jan 27, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NUDG vs TIME growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare NUDG against instead:NUDG vs SPYNUDG vs QQQNUDG vs VOONUDG vs VTITIME against:TIME vs VXUS

NUDG vs TIME Performance

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and Clockwise US Core Equity ETF (TIME) is an ETF from Clockwise Capital. Year to date, NUDG is up 2.67% versus a gain of 11.28% for TIME.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NUDG charges 0.61% per year while TIME charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $96 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 0.67% for TIME.

Holdings Overlap

NUDG already in TIME33.0%
TIME already in NUDG25.3%

33.0% of NUDG's money is in holdings TIME also owns. 25.3% of TIME's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 59 in TIME, against full books of 43 and 56.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 49 positions for TIME that do not appear in our book for NUDG (72.8% of the fund), and 32 for NUDG that do not appear in TIME (61.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NUDGWeight in TIMEDifference
AAPLApple, Inc6.37%9.28%2.91%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.67%6.28%1.39%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.11%2.55%2.56%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.72%0.84%2.88%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.2.04%2.49%0.45%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd2.01%1.96%0.05%
BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc.1.93%0.91%1.02%
ETNEaton Corp Plc2.26%0.55%1.71%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.89%0.41%1.48%

33.0% of NUDG is already inside TIME.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NUDGTIME

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NUDG or TIME?

NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while TIME charges 0.96%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and TIME?

33.0% of NUDG's money is in holdings TIME also owns. 25.3% of TIME's is in holdings NUDG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 59 in TIME.

Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or TIME?

NUDG yields 0.50% while TIME yields 0.67%, so TIME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TIME better than NUDG?

NUDG has a lower expense ratio. TIME led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.