NUDG vs USMC

NUDG vs USMC

Which is better, NUDG or USMC?

USMC has been ahead.

USMC has a lower expense ratio. USMC led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.

Lower Fees: USMCHigher Returns (1Y): USMCLess Concentrated: NUDG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNUDGUSMC
Expense Ratio0.61%0.12%Best
AUM$6.2B$5.2B
Dividend Yield0.50%0.74%
Holdings4358
YTD Return+2.67%+13.98%Best
1Y Return-+14.91%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.81%
Top 10 Weight42.3%Best55.3%
Fund FamilyNuveenPrincipal Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 2, 2026Oct 11, 2017

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NUDG vs USMC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare NUDG against instead:NUDG vs SPYNUDG vs QQQNUDG vs VOONUDG vs VTIUSMC against:USMC vs VXUS

NUDG vs USMC Performance

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds. Year to date, NUDG is up 2.67% versus a gain of 13.98% for USMC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NUDG charges 0.61% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $12 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 0.74% for USMC.

Holdings Overlap

NUDG already in USMC32.8%
USMC already in NUDG36.3%

32.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings USMC also owns. 36.3% of USMC's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 27 in USMC, against full books of 43 and 58.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 18 positions for USMC that do not appear in our book for NUDG (63.6% of the fund), and 32 for NUDG that do not appear in USMC (61.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NUDGWeight in USMCDifference
AAPLApple, Inc6.37%7.40%1.03%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 377.67%5.55%2.12%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.11%4.44%0.67%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.72%4.65%0.93%
MAMastercard Inc2.54%4.32%1.78%
ABBVAbbvie Inc Accenture Plc, Class A1.89%3.37%1.48%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.2.01%2.34%0.33%
CVXChevron Corp.1.66%2.47%0.81%
WMTWalmart, Inc.1.79%1.80%0.01%

36.3% of USMC is already inside NUDG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NUDGUSMC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NUDG or USMC?

NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and USMC?

36.3% of USMC's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 36.3% of USMC's is in holdings NUDG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 27 in USMC.

Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or USMC?

NUDG yields 0.50% while USMC yields 0.74%, so USMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is USMC better than NUDG?

USMC has a lower expense ratio. USMC led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.