NUDG vs UTF
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc
Which is better, NUDG or UTF?
UTF has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. UTF led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDG | UTF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61%Best | 3.42% |
| AUM | $6.2B | $3.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 7.58% |
| Holdings | 43 | 311 |
| YTD Return | +2.67% | +10.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.94% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Cohen & Steers Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2026 | Mar 30, 2004 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NUDG vs UTF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NUDG vs UTF Performance
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc (UTF) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Year to date, NUDG is up 2.67% versus a gain of 10.17% for UTF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDG charges 0.61% per year while UTF charges 3.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $342 annually, a gap of $281 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 7.58% for UTF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.2% of NUDG's money is in holdings UTF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for UTF, our book for it covers 93.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
NUDG and UTF share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, NUDG as of Aug 31, 2026 and UTF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 252 in UTF, against full books of 43 and 311.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NUDG and UTF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDG or UTF?
NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while UTF charges 3.42%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $281 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and UTF?
At least 4.2% of NUDG's money is in holdings UTF also owns. Our book for UTF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 252 in UTF.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or UTF?
NUDG yields 0.50% while UTF yields 7.58%, so UTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UTF better than NUDG?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. UTF led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.