NUKZ vs VXUS
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, NUKZ or VXUS?
Each has led over a different period.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NUKZ led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUKZ | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $666M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 94 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -11.57% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.73% | +17.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.5% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.0% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $23,300Best | $15,767 |
| Fund Family | Range ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
NUKZ vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
NUKZ vs VXUS Performance
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) is an ETF from Range ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUKZ returned -17.73% while VXUS returned +17.01%. Year to date, NUKZ is down 11.57% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.5% compared with 11.2% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.0% for NUKZ and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUKZ charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUKZ currently yields 0.96% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 31.6% of NUKZ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in NUKZ and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 94 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUKZ | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCO:CACameco Corporation Com Npv | 9.05% | 0.09% | 8.96% |
| RR:LNRolls-Royce Holdings PLC Ord Gbp0.20 | 3.22% | 0.37% | 2.85% |
| 6501:JPHitachi Ltd | 2.69% | 0.33% | 2.36% |
| 015760:KRKorea Electric Power Corporation (Kepco) | 2.78% | 0.01% | 2.77% |
| 7011:JPMitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. Com Stk | 2.47% | 0.17% | 2.30% |
| 028260:KRSamsung C&T Corp | 2.26% | 0.05% | 2.21% |
| CEZ:MUCez As | 2.05% | 0.02% | 2.03% |
| ATRL:CAAtkinsrealis Group Inc | 1.95% | 0.02% | 1.93% |
| 000150:KRDoosan Corp | 1.53% | 0.01% | 1.52% |
| EFR:CAEnergy Fuels Inc | 1.45% | 0.01% | 1.44% |
31.6% of NUKZ is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or VXUS?
NUKZ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUKZ or VXUS?
Over the past year NUKZ returned -17.73% vs +17.01% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUKZ or VXUS?
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund at 32.5% annualized versus 11.2% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NUKZ -33.0% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both NUKZ and VXUS?
NUKZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUKZ and VXUS?
At least 31.6% of NUKZ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in NUKZ and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUKZ or VXUS?
NUKZ yields 0.96% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than NUKZ?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NUKZ led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.