NURE vs SYLD
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF vs Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
Which is better, NURE or SYLD?
SYLD has been ahead.
NURE has a lower expense ratio. SYLD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SYLD is less concentrated, with 10.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NURE | SYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $30M | $987M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.42% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 58 | 200 |
| YTD Return | +5.63% | +16.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.18% | +21.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.85% | +12.08%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.51% | +7.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3%Best | 21.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -45.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,267 | $14,423Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.9% | 10.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Cambria Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 19, 2016 | May 13, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.8 years).
NURE vs SYLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
NURE vs SYLD Performance
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) is an ETF from Nuveen and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year NURE returned +6.18% while SYLD returned +21.10%. Year to date, NURE is up 5.63% versus a gain of 16.89% for SYLD.
Over three years, NURE compounded at +5.85% per year against +12.08% for SYLD; over five years the annualized figures are -1.51% and +7.60% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SYLD has the edge at +11.93% annualized vs +5.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 18.3% for NURE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for NURE and -45.4% for SYLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NURE charges 0.36% per year while SYLD charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $59 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NURE currently yields 4.42% against 1.82% for SYLD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 28 holdings in NURE and 101 in SYLD, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in NURE and 101 in SYLD, against full books of 58 and 200.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 100 positions for SYLD that do not appear in our book for NURE (98.9% of the fund), and 28 for NURE that do not appear in SYLD (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NURE and SYLD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NURE or SYLD?
NURE has an expense ratio of 0.36% while SYLD charges 0.59%. NURE is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NURE or SYLD?
Over the past year NURE returned +6.18% vs +21.10% for SYLD, so SYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), NURE annualized +5.05% vs +11.93% for SYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NURE or SYLD?
SYLD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 18.3% for NURE. Worst drawdown: NURE -46.0% vs SYLD -45.4%.
Should I hold both NURE and SYLD?
NURE and SYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NURE or SYLD?
NURE yields 4.42% while SYLD yields 1.82%, so NURE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SYLD better than NURE?
NURE has a lower expense ratio. SYLD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SYLD is less concentrated, with 10.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.