NVPS vs QQQ

NVPS vs QQQ

Which is better, NVPS or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NVPS is less concentrated, with 46.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: NVPS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVPSQQQ
Expense Ratio0.75%0.18%Best
AUM$3M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.04%0.42%
Holdings120321
YTD Return-18.90%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight46.4%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyExchange Traded Concepts TrustInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 17, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NVPS vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NVPS vs QQQ Performance

PurePlay NVIDIA Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index ETF (NVPS) is an ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NVPS is down 18.90% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVPS charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVPS currently yields 0.04% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

NVPS already in QQQ25.5%
QQQ already in NVPS14.3%

25.5% of NVPS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings NVPS also owns.

NVPS and QQQ share little of their money.

9 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NVPS and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 120 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 84 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NVPS (82.0% of the fund), and 12 for NVPS that do not appear in QQQ (27.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NVPSWeight in QQQDifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.93%5.02%0.91%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity3.38%1.72%1.66%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.31%2.53%0.22%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.3.07%1.70%1.37%
KLACKla-tencor3.03%1.06%1.97%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc2.98%0.97%2.01%
SNPSSynopsys2.41%0.35%2.06%
ARMArm Holdings Plc Adr1.32%0.53%0.79%
CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc.1.03%0.38%0.65%

25.5% of NVPS is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NVPSQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVPS or QQQ?

NVPS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NVPS and QQQ?

25.5% of NVPS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.3% of QQQ's is in holdings NVPS also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NVPS and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVPS or QQQ?

NVPS yields 0.04% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than NVPS?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NVPS is less concentrated, with 46.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.