NVPS vs VTI

NVPS vs VTI

Which is better, NVPS or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVPSVTI
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$3M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.04%1.06%
Holdings1203,524
YTD Return-18.90%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight46.4%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyExchange Traded Concepts TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 17, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NVPS vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NVPS vs VTI Performance

PurePlay NVIDIA Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index ETF (NVPS) is an ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NVPS is down 18.90% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVPS charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVPS currently yields 0.04% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

NVPS already in VTI51.0%
VTI already in NVPS6.7%

51.0% of NVPS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.7% of VTI's money is in holdings NVPS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

19 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NVPS and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 120 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NVPS (90.9% of the fund), and 2 for NVPS that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NVPSWeight in VTIDifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.93%1.46%4.47%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co5.87%0.13%5.74%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.31%2.38%0.07%
SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc Common Stock USD.0013.92%0.03%3.89%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity3.38%0.51%2.87%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.3.07%0.49%2.58%
KLACKla-tencor3.03%0.31%2.72%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc2.98%0.26%2.72%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock2.91%0.28%2.63%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust2.71%0.14%2.57%

51.0% of NVPS is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NVPSVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVPS or VTI?

NVPS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NVPS and VTI?

51.0% of NVPS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.7% of VTI's is in holdings NVPS also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NVPS and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVPS or VTI?

NVPS yields 0.04% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than NVPS?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.