OAKM vs PSIL
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, OAKM or PSIL?
Each has led over a different period.
OAKM has a lower expense ratio. OAKM led over 1Y, PSIL over the full window. OAKM is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKM | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $1.1B | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 7.45% |
| Holdings | 41 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +6.05% | +16.80%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.80%Best | +9.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -23.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 30.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2%Best | -34.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,344 | $19,841Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
OAKM vs PSIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
OAKM vs PSIL Performance
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year OAKM returned +14.80% while PSIL returned +9.75%. Year to date, OAKM is up 6.05% versus a gain of 16.80% for PSIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.4% compared with 12.2% for OAKM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for OAKM and -34.6% for PSIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKM charges 0.59% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $100 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKM currently yields 0.65% against 7.45% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 39 holdings in OAKM and 29 in PSIL, totalling 99.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 29 in PSIL, against full books of 41 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for PSIL that do not appear in our book for OAKM (62.6% of the fund), and 36 for OAKM that do not appear in PSIL (92.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OAKM and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKM or PSIL?
OAKM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PSIL charges 1.00%. OAKM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OAKM or PSIL?
Over the past year OAKM returned +14.80% vs +9.75% for PSIL, so OAKM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OAKM annualized +11.72% vs +43.42% for PSIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OAKM or PSIL?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 30.4% annualized versus 12.2% for OAKM. Worst drawdown: OAKM -15.2% vs PSIL -34.6%.
Should I hold both OAKM and PSIL?
OAKM and PSIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKM or PSIL?
OAKM yields 0.65% while PSIL yields 7.45%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than OAKM?
OAKM has a lower expense ratio. OAKM led over 1Y, PSIL over the full window. OAKM is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.