OAKM vs RFDA
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF vs ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Which is better, OAKM or RFDA?
RFDA has been ahead.
RFDA has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 30.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKM | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 2.00% |
| Holdings | 41 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +6.05% | +14.73%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.80% | +16.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.07% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 11.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2%Best | -19.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,344 | $12,900Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 30.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Jun 6, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
OAKM vs RFDA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
OAKM vs RFDA Performance
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year OAKM returned +14.80% while RFDA returned +16.68%. Year to date, OAKM is up 6.05% versus a gain of 14.73% for RFDA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OAKM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.0% for RFDA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for OAKM and -19.4% for RFDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKM charges 0.59% per year while RFDA charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $52 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKM currently yields 0.65% against 2.00% for RFDA.
Holdings Overlap
18.6% of OAKM's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 12.2% of RFDA's money is in holdings OAKM also owns.
OAKM and RFDA share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 75 in RFDA, against full books of 41 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for RFDA that do not appear in our book for OAKM (84.3% of the fund), and 29 for OAKM that do not appear in RFDA (74.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OAKM and RFDA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKM or RFDA?
OAKM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while RFDA charges 0.52%. RFDA is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OAKM or RFDA?
Over the past year OAKM returned +14.80% vs +16.68% for RFDA, so RFDA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OAKM annualized +11.72% vs +14.34% for RFDA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OAKM or RFDA?
OAKM has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.0% for RFDA. Worst drawdown: OAKM -15.2% vs RFDA -19.4%.
Should I hold both OAKM and RFDA?
OAKM and RFDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKM and RFDA?
18.6% of OAKM's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 12.2% of RFDA's is in holdings OAKM also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 75 in RFDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKM or RFDA?
OAKM yields 0.65% while RFDA yields 2.00%, so RFDA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RFDA better than OAKM?
RFDA has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 30.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.