OAKM vs WBIG
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Which is better, OAKM or WBIG?
OAKM has been ahead.
OAKM has a lower expense ratio. OAKM led over 1Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKM | WBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59%Best | 1.59% |
| AUM | $1.1B | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 41 | 159 |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +13.75%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.37%Best | +11.90% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +1.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2%Best | -19.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,569Best | $10,799 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 23.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.9 years).
OAKM vs WBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
OAKM vs WBIG Performance
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year OAKM returned +16.37% while WBIG returned +11.90%. Year to date, OAKM is up 7.98% versus a gain of 13.75% for WBIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OAKM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.5% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for OAKM and -19.6% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKM charges 0.59% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $159 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKM currently yields 0.65% against 1.17% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
8.2% of OAKM's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 4.1% of WBIG's money is in holdings OAKM also owns.
OAKM and WBIG share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 71 in WBIG, against full books of 41 and 159.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 64 positions for WBIG that do not appear in our book for OAKM (88.5% of the fund), and 33 for OAKM that do not appear in WBIG (84.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OAKM and WBIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKM or WBIG?
OAKM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while WBIG charges 1.59%. OAKM is the cheaper option, by $100 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OAKM or WBIG?
Over the past year OAKM returned +16.37% vs +11.90% for WBIG, so OAKM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OAKM annualized +12.79% vs +4.13% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OAKM or WBIG?
OAKM has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.5% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: OAKM -15.2% vs WBIG -19.6%.
Should I hold both OAKM and WBIG?
OAKM and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKM and WBIG?
8.2% of OAKM's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 4.1% of WBIG's is in holdings OAKM also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 71 in WBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKM or WBIG?
OAKM yields 0.65% while WBIG yields 1.17%, so WBIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIG better than OAKM?
OAKM has a lower expense ratio. OAKM led over 1Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.