OGIG vs VTI
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, OGIG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OGIG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $106M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -2.92% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.78% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.94% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.00% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 17.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -66.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,039 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.4 years).
OGIG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.4 years both funds cover.
OGIG vs VTI Performance
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, OGIG is down 2.92% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, OGIG compounded at +16.94% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.00% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.42% annualized vs +8.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OGIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 17.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.0% for OGIG and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OGIG charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OGIG currently yields 0.08% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
80.4% of OGIG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.6% of VTI's money is in holdings OGIG also owns.
Most of OGIG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
37 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 55 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,119 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for OGIG (80.0% of the fund), and 4 for OGIG that do not appear in VTI (5.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OGIG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.05% | 5.11% | 0.94% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.75% | 3.41% | 2.34% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.94% | 2.70% | 3.24% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.50% | 1.70% | 4.80% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.05% | 0.55% | 4.50% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 4.03% | 0.35% | 3.68% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.13% | 0.42% | 2.71% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.06% | 0.30% | 2.76% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 2.53% | 0.13% | 2.40% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 2.47% | 0.15% | 2.32% |
80.4% of OGIG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OGIG or VTI?
OGIG has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OGIG or VTI?
Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), OGIG annualized +8.63% vs +13.42% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OGIG or VTI?
OGIG has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 17.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OGIG -66.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both OGIG and VTI?
OGIG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OGIG and VTI?
80.4% of OGIG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.6% of VTI's is in holdings OGIG also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, OGIG or VTI?
OGIG yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than OGIG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.