OMFS vs TSEE

OMFS vs TSEE

Which is better, OMFS or TSEE?

OMFS costs less.

OMFS has a lower expense ratio. OMFS is less concentrated, with 12.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 14.7%.

Lower Fees: OMFSLess Concentrated: OMFS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOMFSTSEE
Expense Ratio0.39%Best0.59%
AUM$264M$10M
Dividend Yield1.30%0.00%
Holdings2,228220
YTD Return+8.89%Best-4.78%
1Y Return+10.32%-
3Y Return (annualized)+14.55%-
5Y Return (annualized)+4.67%-
Top 10 Weight12.0%Best14.7%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)T.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendSmall Cap Blend
InceptionNov 8, 2017Sep 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

OMFS vs TSEE growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare OMFS against instead:OMFS vs SPYOMFS vs QQQOMFS vs VOOOMFS vs VTITSEE against:TSEE vs VXUS

OMFS vs TSEE Performance

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap ETF (TSEE) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, OMFS is up 8.89% versus a loss of 4.78% for TSEE.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OMFS charges 0.39% per year while TSEE charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.30% against 0.00% for TSEE.

Holdings Overlap

OMFS already in TSEE17.1%
TSEE already in OMFS37.9%

17.1% of OMFS's money is in holdings TSEE also owns. 37.9% of TSEE's money is in holdings OMFS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

86 positions in common, counted across the 933 positions we hold weights for in OMFS and 220 in TSEE, against full books of 2,228 and 220.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 113 positions for TSEE that do not appear in our book for OMFS (52.6% of the fund), and 796 for OMFS that do not appear in TSEE (76.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OMFSWeight in TSEEDifference
FCFSFirstcash Inc1.53%1.19%0.34%
CTRECaretrust Reit Inc Reit Usd.011.64%1.04%0.60%
IDCCInterdigital Inc0.64%1.58%0.94%
MYRGMyrgroupinc.1.20%0.32%0.88%
TRNOTerreno Realty Corp1.17%0.34%0.83%
BTSGBrightspring Health0.19%1.30%1.11%
MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corp0.25%1.15%0.90%
GOGrocery Outlet Holding Corp0.02%1.27%1.25%
GLNGGolar Lng Limited Ordinary Shares0.14%1.10%0.96%
ESEEsco Technologies Inc0.14%1.04%0.90%

37.9% of TSEE is already inside OMFS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

OMFSTSEE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OMFS or TSEE?

OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while TSEE charges 0.59%. OMFS is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and TSEE?

37.9% of TSEE's money is in holdings OMFS also owns. 37.9% of TSEE's is in holdings OMFS also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 933 positions we hold weights for in OMFS and 220 in TSEE.

Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or TSEE?

OMFS yields 1.30% while TSEE yields 0.00%, so OMFS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSEE better than OMFS?

OMFS has a lower expense ratio. OMFS is less concentrated, with 12.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 14.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.