ONEZ vs PJAN
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, ONEZ or PJAN?
PJAN has been ahead.
PJAN has a lower expense ratio. PJAN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONEZ | PJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $356M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.63% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 32 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +7.97% | +8.58%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.09% | +11.69%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.07% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 6.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -10.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,314 | $11,927Best |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2025 | Dec 31, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
ONEZ vs PJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
ONEZ vs PJAN Performance
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% while PJAN returned +11.69%. Year to date, ONEZ is up 7.97% versus a gain of 8.58% for PJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 6.1% for PJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for ONEZ and -10.5% for PJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONEZ charges 0.96% per year while PJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $79 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEZ currently yields 3.63% against 0.00% for PJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ONEZ and PJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONEZ or PJAN?
ONEZ has an expense ratio of 0.96% while PJAN charges 0.79%. PJAN is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ONEZ or PJAN?
Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% vs +11.69% for PJAN, so PJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ONEZ annualized +7.53% vs +10.92% for PJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ONEZ or PJAN?
ONEZ has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 6.1% for PJAN. Worst drawdown: ONEZ -13.2% vs PJAN -10.5%.
Should I hold both ONEZ and PJAN?
ONEZ and PJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONEZ or PJAN?
ONEZ yields 3.63% while PJAN yields 0.00%, so ONEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJAN better than ONEZ?
PJAN has a lower expense ratio. PJAN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.