ONEZ vs PJUN
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, ONEZ or PJUN?
PJUN has been ahead.
PJUN has a lower expense ratio. PJUN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONEZ | PJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $356M | $888M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.63% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 32 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +7.97%Best | +5.53% |
| 1Y Return | +6.09% | +7.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 5.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -10.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,314 | $11,646Best |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2025 | May 31, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
ONEZ vs PJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
ONEZ vs PJUN Performance
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% while PJUN returned +7.82%. Year to date, ONEZ is up 7.97% versus a gain of 5.53% for PJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 5.8% for PJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for ONEZ and -10.1% for PJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONEZ charges 0.96% per year while PJUN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $79 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEZ currently yields 3.63% against 0.00% for PJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ONEZ and PJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONEZ or PJUN?
ONEZ has an expense ratio of 0.96% while PJUN charges 0.79%. PJUN is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ONEZ or PJUN?
Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% vs +7.82% for PJUN, so PJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ONEZ annualized +7.53% vs +9.38% for PJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ONEZ or PJUN?
ONEZ has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 5.8% for PJUN. Worst drawdown: ONEZ -13.2% vs PJUN -10.1%.
Should I hold both ONEZ and PJUN?
ONEZ and PJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONEZ or PJUN?
ONEZ yields 3.63% while PJUN yields 0.00%, so ONEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJUN better than ONEZ?
PJUN has a lower expense ratio. PJUN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.