ONEZ vs XBJA
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, ONEZ or XBJA?
XBJA has been ahead.
XBJA has a lower expense ratio. XBJA led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONEZ | XBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $356M | $94M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.63% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 32 | 21 |
| YTD Return | +7.97% | +8.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.09% | +11.38%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 6.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -12.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,314 | $11,943Best |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2025 | Dec 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
ONEZ vs XBJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
ONEZ vs XBJA Performance
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% while XBJA returned +11.38%. Year to date, ONEZ is up 7.97% versus a gain of 8.88% for XBJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 6.8% for XBJA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for ONEZ and -12.6% for XBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONEZ charges 0.96% per year while XBJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $79 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEZ currently yields 3.63% against 0.00% for XBJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ONEZ and XBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONEZ or XBJA?
ONEZ has an expense ratio of 0.96% while XBJA charges 0.79%. XBJA is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ONEZ or XBJA?
Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% vs +11.38% for XBJA, so XBJA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ONEZ annualized +7.53% vs +11.01% for XBJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ONEZ or XBJA?
ONEZ has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 6.8% for XBJA. Worst drawdown: ONEZ -13.2% vs XBJA -12.6%.
Should I hold both ONEZ and XBJA?
ONEZ and XBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONEZ or XBJA?
ONEZ yields 3.63% while XBJA yields 0.00%, so ONEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBJA better than ONEZ?
XBJA has a lower expense ratio. XBJA led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.