ONEZ vs ZDEK

ONEZ vs ZDEK

Which is better, ONEZ or ZDEK?

Each has led over a different period.

ZDEK has a lower expense ratio. ONEZ led over the full window, ZDEK over 1Y.

Lower Fees: ZDEKHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricONEZZDEK
Expense Ratio0.96%0.79%Best
AUM$356M$107M
Dividend Yield3.63%0.00%
Holdings3215
YTD Return+7.97%Best+4.72%
1Y Return+6.09%+6.69%Best
Volatility (annualized)9.4%2.8%Best
Max Drawdown-13.2%-3.4%Best
$10,000 over 1.7 years$11,314Best$11,174
Fund FamilyTrueSharesInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJan 27, 2025Nov 29, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).

ONEZ vs ZDEK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

Compare ONEZ against instead:ONEZ vs SPYONEZ vs QQQONEZ vs VOOONEZ vs VTIZDEK against:ZDEK vs VXUS

ONEZ vs ZDEK Performance

TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% while ZDEK returned +6.69%. Year to date, ONEZ is up 7.97% versus a gain of 4.72% for ZDEK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ONEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 2.8% for ZDEK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for ONEZ and -3.4% for ZDEK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ONEZ charges 0.96% per year while ZDEK charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $79 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEZ currently yields 3.63% against 0.00% for ZDEK.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ONEZ and ZDEK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ONEZZDEK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ONEZ or ZDEK?

ONEZ has an expense ratio of 0.96% while ZDEK charges 0.79%. ZDEK is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ONEZ or ZDEK?

Over the past year ONEZ returned +6.09% vs +6.69% for ZDEK, so ZDEK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ONEZ annualized +7.53% vs +6.75% for ZDEK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ONEZ or ZDEK?

ONEZ has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 2.8% for ZDEK. Worst drawdown: ONEZ -13.2% vs ZDEK -3.4%.

Should I hold both ONEZ and ZDEK?

ONEZ and ZDEK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ONEZ or ZDEK?

ONEZ yields 3.63% while ZDEK yields 0.00%, so ONEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZDEK better than ONEZ?

ZDEK has a lower expense ratio. ONEZ led over the full window, ZDEK over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.