PCLG vs QRFT
Polen Focus Growth ETF vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, PCLG or QRFT?
QRFT has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y. QRFT is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLG | QRFT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $92M | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 27 | 301 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.6% | 45.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | May 20, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 85 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. PCLG has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QRFT through Jul 21, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLG charges 0.49% per year while QRFT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $75 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLG currently yields 0.04% against 0.25% for QRFT.
Holdings Overlap
50.3% of PCLG's money is in holdings QRFT also owns. 27.9% of QRFT's money is in holdings PCLG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 161 days apart, PCLG as of Oct 8, 2026 and QRFT as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
15 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 294 in QRFT, against full books of 27 and 301.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 266 positions for QRFT that do not appear in our book for PCLG (69.5% of the fund), and 9 for PCLG that do not appear in QRFT (40.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PCLG | Weight in QRFT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.82% | 9.65% | 1.83% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.98% | 5.92% | 0.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 6.13% | 4.11% | 2.02% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.38% | 2.76% | 1.62% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.80% | 2.00% | 2.80% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 5.54% | 0.91% | 4.63% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.51% | 0.12% | 2.39% |
| IDXXIdexx Laboratories Inc Common Stock Usd 0.1 | 2.37% | 0.10% | 2.27% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.79% | 0.65% | 1.14% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 1.74% | 0.58% | 1.16% |
50.3% of PCLG is already inside QRFT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLG or QRFT?
PCLG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QRFT charges 0.75%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PCLG and QRFT?
50.3% of PCLG's money is in holdings QRFT also owns. 27.9% of QRFT's is in holdings PCLG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 294 in QRFT.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLG or QRFT?
PCLG yields 0.04% while QRFT yields 0.25%, so QRFT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QRFT better than PCLG?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y. QRFT is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.