PJUS vs PWRD
PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Which is better, PJUS or PWRD?
PJUS costs less.
PJUS has a lower expense ratio. PJUS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJUS | PWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $7M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 198 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +5.58%Best | +1.99% |
| 1Y Return | - | +0.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.10% |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2%Best | 50.6% |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2026 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PJUS vs PWRD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PJUS vs PWRD Performance
PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF (PJUS) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Year to date, PJUS is up 5.58% versus a gain of 1.99% for PWRD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJUS charges 0.19% per year while PWRD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $75 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJUS currently yields 0.00% against 0.06% for PWRD.
Holdings Overlap
8.6% of PJUS's money is in holdings PWRD also owns. 34.0% of PWRD's money is in holdings PJUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in PJUS and 28 in PWRD, against full books of 198 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for PWRD that do not appear in our book for PJUS (47.3% of the fund), and 87 for PJUS that do not appear in PWRD (90.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJUS | Weight in PWRD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.24% | 8.02% | 7.78% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.31% | 3.79% | 1.48% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.67% | 4.29% | 2.62% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.74% | 4.88% | 4.14% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 0.85% | 3.35% | 2.50% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.40% | 3.56% | 3.16% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.02% | 1.97% | 0.95% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 0.95% | 1.81% | 0.86% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.43% | 2.32% | 1.89% |
34.0% of PWRD is already inside PJUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJUS or PWRD?
PJUS has an expense ratio of 0.19% while PWRD charges 0.75%. PJUS is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PJUS and PWRD?
34.0% of PWRD's money is in holdings PJUS also owns. 34.0% of PWRD's is in holdings PJUS also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in PJUS and 28 in PWRD.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJUS or PWRD?
PJUS yields 0.00% while PWRD yields 0.06%, so PWRD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PWRD better than PJUS?
PJUS has a lower expense ratio. PJUS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.