PMJL vs SIXZ
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July vs AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF
Which is better, PMJL or SIXZ?
Nearly the same fund. PMJL costs less.
PMJL has a lower expense ratio. SIXZ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMJL | SIXZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $7M | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +4.49% | +9.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.84% | +11.53%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9%Best | 6.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5%Best | -4.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,813 | $11,485Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | AllianzIM |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2025 | Apr 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
PMJL vs SIXZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
PMJL vs SIXZ Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year PMJL returned +5.84% while SIXZ returned +11.53%. Year to date, PMJL is up 4.49% versus a gain of 9.88% for SIXZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIXZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.3% compared with 1.9% for PMJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for PMJL and -4.5% for SIXZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMJL charges 0.50% per year while SIXZ charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $74 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMJL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for SIXZ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PMJL and SIXZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMJL or SIXZ?
PMJL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SIXZ charges 0.74%. PMJL is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PMJL or SIXZ?
Over the past year PMJL returned +5.84% vs +11.53% for SIXZ, so SIXZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PMJL annualized +6.20% vs +11.24% for SIXZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PMJL or SIXZ?
SIXZ has been the more volatile fund at 6.3% annualized versus 1.9% for PMJL. Worst drawdown: PMJL -1.5% vs SIXZ -4.5%.
Should I hold both PMJL and SIXZ?
PMJL and SIXZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMJL or SIXZ?
PMJL yields 0.00% while SIXZ yields 0.00%, so SIXZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIXZ better than PMJL?
PMJL has a lower expense ratio. SIXZ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.