PWZ vs VTI
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PWZ or VTI?
Municipal California against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PWZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2,504 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -4.44% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.34% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.30% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.08% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0%Best | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.7%Best | -56.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,472 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal California | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19 years).
PWZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PWZ vs VTI Performance
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PWZ returned -3.34% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PWZ is down 4.44% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, PWZ compounded at +2.30% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.08% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.15% annualized vs +0.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 7.0% for PWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.7% for PWZ and -56.5% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PWZ charges 0.28% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PWZ currently yields 4.07% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 482 holdings in PWZ and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 31.3% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 482 positions we hold weights for in PWZ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 2,504 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PWZ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PWZ or VTI?
PWZ has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PWZ or VTI?
Over the past year PWZ returned -3.34% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), PWZ annualized +0.33% vs +9.15% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PWZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 7.0% for PWZ. Worst drawdown: PWZ -24.7% vs VTI -56.5%.
Should I hold both PWZ and VTI?
PWZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PWZ or VTI?
PWZ yields 4.07% while VTI yields 1.06%, so PWZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PWZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.