QCLR vs QQQ
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, QCLR or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.07% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 215 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +0.23% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.28% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.80% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.69% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 20.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,879 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.1% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
QCLR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
QCLR vs QQQ Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QCLR returned +1.28% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, QCLR is up 0.23% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +16.80% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.69% and +15.42% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 12.8% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.07% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
96.0% of QCLR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 95.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings QCLR also owns.
Most of QCLR is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
96 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QCLR and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 215 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for QCLR (2.8% of the fund), and 3 for QCLR that do not appear in QQQ (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCLR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.49% | 8.33% | 0.16% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.34% | 7.35% | 0.01% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.78% | 5.76% | 0.02% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.04% | 5.02% | 0.02% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.30% | 4.17% | 0.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.08% | 4.07% | 0.01% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.25% | 3.26% | 0.01% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.03% | 3.05% | 0.02% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.92% | 2.82% | 0.10% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.83% | 2.85% | 0.02% |
96.0% of QCLR is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or QQQ?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QCLR or QQQ?
Over the past year QCLR returned +1.28% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QCLR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 12.8% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both QCLR and QQQ?
QCLR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and QQQ?
96.0% of QCLR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 95.0% of QQQ's is in holdings QCLR also owns. They hold 96 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QCLR and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or QQQ?
QCLR yields 15.07% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than QCLR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.