QFRD vs QQQ

QFRD vs QQQ

Which is better, QFRD or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 40.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QFRD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQFRDQQQ
Expense Ratio0.49%0.18%Best
AUM$2M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.12%0.42%
Holdings102321
YTD Return+23.82%Best+19.30%
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight40.0%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 12, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QFRD vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QFRD vs QQQ Performance

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, QFRD is up 23.82% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QFRD charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFRD currently yields 0.12% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

QFRD already in QQQ63.7%
QQQ already in QFRD35.0%

63.7% of QFRD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 35.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings QFRD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

28 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 102 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 65 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for QFRD (61.3% of the fund), and 20 for QFRD that do not appear in QQQ (36.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QFRDWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp1.44%8.33%6.89%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc4.51%4.17%0.34%
DDOGDatadog Inc6.47%0.38%6.09%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc5.13%1.13%4.00%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.42%3.26%0.84%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc4.05%1.35%2.70%
WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A4.06%0.16%3.90%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C1.05%2.85%1.80%
CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc.3.30%0.38%2.92%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.15%2.53%1.38%

63.7% of QFRD is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QFRDQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QFRD or QQQ?

QFRD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QFRD and QQQ?

63.7% of QFRD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 35.0% of QQQ's is in holdings QFRD also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, QFRD or QQQ?

QFRD yields 0.12% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than QFRD?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 40.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.