QFRD vs VTI

QFRD vs VTI

Which is better, QFRD or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQFRDVTI
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.12%1.06%
Holdings1023,524
YTD Return+23.82%Best+13.02%
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight40.0%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 12, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QFRD vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QFRD vs VTI Performance

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QFRD is up 23.82% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QFRD charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFRD currently yields 0.12% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

QFRD already in VTI98.5%
VTI already in QFRD22.7%

98.5% of QFRD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 22.7% of VTI's money is in holdings QFRD also owns.

Most of QFRD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

47 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 102 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,109 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QFRD (74.8% of the fund), and 1 for QFRD that do not appear in VTI (1.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QFRDWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp1.44%6.88%5.44%
DDOGDatadog Inc6.47%0.11%6.36%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc4.51%1.04%3.47%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc5.13%0.30%4.83%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc4.05%0.42%3.63%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.42%1.70%0.72%
WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A4.06%0.05%4.01%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.23%1.33%0.90%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.15%2.38%1.23%
CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc.3.30%0.13%3.17%

98.5% of QFRD is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QFRDVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QFRD or VTI?

QFRD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QFRD and VTI?

98.5% of QFRD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 22.7% of VTI's is in holdings QFRD also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, QFRD or VTI?

QFRD yields 0.12% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than QFRD?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.