QQQ vs RNRG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RNRG?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RNRG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 321 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -6.85% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | -3.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18%Best | +4.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42%Best | -7.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8%Best | 19.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,484Best | $6,923 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7%Best | 55.6% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 27, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 28, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.4 years).
QQQ vs RNRG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RNRG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while RNRG returned -3.85%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 6.85% for RNRG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.18% per year against +4.44% for RNRG; over five years the annualized figures are +15.42% and -7.09% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.36% annualized vs -2.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -58.8% for RNRG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RNRG charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 1.82% for RNRG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 38 in RNRG, totalling 99.6% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 38 in RNRG, against full books of 321 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for RNRG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (11.1% of the fund), and 93 for QQQ that do not appear in RNRG (96.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RNRG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RNRG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RNRG charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RNRG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs -3.85% for RNRG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QQQ annualized +18.36% vs -2.73% for RNRG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RNRG?
RNRG has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs RNRG -58.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RNRG?
QQQ and RNRG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RNRG?
QQQ yields 0.42% while RNRG yields 1.82%, so RNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RNRG better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.