RNRG vs VYM
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RNRG or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNRG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 40 | 608 |
| YTD Return | -6.85% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.85% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.44% | +18.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.09% | +11.51%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,923 | $17,241Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.6% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 27, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 28, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.4 years).
RNRG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.
RNRG vs VYM Performance
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNRG returned -3.85% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, RNRG is down 6.85% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, RNRG compounded at +4.44% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -7.09% and +11.51% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.03% annualized vs -2.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for RNRG and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNRG charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNRG currently yields 1.82% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
2.8% of RNRG's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
RNRG and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in RNRG and 602 in VYM, against full books of 40 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 572 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for RNRG (97.8% of the fund), and 5 for RNRG that do not appear in VYM (8.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RNRG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CWENClearway Energy, Inc., Class C | 2.77% | 0.02% | 2.75% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RNRG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNRG or VYM?
RNRG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RNRG or VYM?
Over the past year RNRG returned -3.85% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), RNRG annualized -2.73% vs +9.03% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RNRG or VYM?
RNRG has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RNRG -58.8% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both RNRG and VYM?
RNRG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RNRG and VYM?
2.8% of RNRG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.0% of VYM's is in holdings RNRG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in RNRG and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNRG or VYM?
RNRG yields 1.82% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RNRG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.